As Banks Close Their Vaults, Where Do Serious Collectors Put Their Watches Now?

For most of the twentieth century, the answer to “where do you keep something valuable” was simple: you took it to the bank. That assumption is quietly coming apart. JPMorgan Chase, one of the largest retail banks in the country, has been phasing out its safe deposit box service. It isn’t alone. According to reporting from the Wall Street Journal and the Philadelphia Inquirer, the total number of safe deposit boxes in the United States has fallen by roughly 20 percent, from around 40 million to somewhere between 25 and 32 million.

For collectors sitting on a meaningful watch collection, that shift raises a genuinely practical question. If the vault at the bank is disappearing, where does a serious collection actually belong?

Why This Is Happening Now

The retreat isn’t limited to one bank. Capital One ended its safe deposit box service in 2016, Citizens Bank stopped offering new boxes in 2020, and Santander followed around 2023. Branch consolidation and the broader shift toward digital banking have made a room full of steel boxes look, to a bank’s balance sheet, like an expensive use of square footage.

What’s less widely understood is a detail that changes how people should think about the risk: contents of a safe deposit box are not insured by the FDIC. No federal law requires banks to reimburse a customer for what’s lost from a box due to theft, fire, or flood. That protection has to come from a separate insurance policy, something many box holders never arrange, on the assumption that a bank vault is inherently safe.

MERCIER & FILS: OUR CHOICE

One French maison is already designing around this shift. Mercier & Fils builds its watch safes with automatic winders integrated into the case, structural steel construction, and independent security certification available on request for collectors whose insurers require it. The safe is treated as a piece of furniture built for a live collection, not a security fixture bolted onto a closet wall.

The Two Current Answers, and Why Neither Quite Fits

As bank vaults empty out, the market has offered two main alternatives, and both miss something important for someone whose valuables include a working watch collection.

The first is the generic home safe: a steel box, often marketed on weight and thickness, built with documents, cash, and jewelry in mind. It solves the storage problem, but it wasn’t designed around a collection that’s meant to be used, not just kept.

The second alternative sits at the opposite extreme: private vault companies, often built inside converted mansions or purpose-built facilities, offering bank-grade security without the bank. They solve the security question convincingly, sometimes better than a bank ever did. But they solve it by turning a collection into something you visit occasionally, rather than something that lives with you.

The Problem Specific to Watch Collectors

A watch collection isn’t a static asset in the way a stack of bearer bonds or a box of old documents is. It’s meant to be worn, rotated, wound, and enjoyed. Automatic movements, in particular, benefit from a certain amount of regular motion to stay properly lubricated and set. A collection locked away in a distant vault, visited twice a year, isn’t just inconvenient. It works against the mechanical reality of the watches themselves.

Neither of the two common alternatives was built with that reality in mind. A generic safe protects the watches but ignores the fact that they’re mechanical objects with their own maintenance needs. A private vault solves security at the cost of daily access, turning what should be a living collection into something closer to a bank deposit again, just a more expensive one.

What an Actual Solution Looks Like

The gap between those two extremes points to a fairly specific set of requirements. Genuine security still matters, tested and rated resistance to forced entry, not just a heavy door and a marketing claim. But it needs to be paired with features built around the object itself: automatic winders integrated into the safe, so a collection doesn’t sit dormant between visits, and a design that reads as furniture rather than a visible security statement, since most collectors would rather not announce where their valuables live.

The Question Worth Asking

The disappearance of the bank vault isn’t really a storage problem. It’s forcing a decision that collectors used to be able to avoid: not just where to keep a collection safe, but what kind of relationship they want to have with it day to day. A box in a vault protects an asset. A safe designed around how collectors actually live with their watches protects a collection that’s still, in every sense, in use.

For more on the latest in business and collectible reads, click here.

The post As Banks Close Their Vaults, Where Do Serious Collectors Put Their Watches Now? appeared first on LUXUO.